What is marriage?

The best definition of a marriage in the bible, the old testament Malachi 2:14, marriage is a covenant before god. The old testament is the common religious text of Judaism, Islam and Christianity. The marriage ceremony is a declaration before the public that the couple are entering into a covenant between the two of them and god, the public are the witnesses to the covenant. Marriage is not a partnership or a contract, as the are agreements where considerations are given for consideration, then accepted or rejected. Partnerships and contracts can be ended by mutual consent of all parties concerned. A covenant is of undetermined length, until death us do part. The marriage ceremony is a lawful Union of a man and a woman. A verbal declaration before the people and god is binding. If this is so why do all marriages in a religious setting have to complete a register? This is a legal wedding. What's the difference, a lawful marriage is a covenant, a legal wedding is a contract. This is why the legal system must be involved in a divorce as the parties have to dissolve a contract. A registry office or non religious wedding is just a contract and more importantly it is not a marriage!

PCSO'S

The wonderful people that are now employed as PCSO'S are the ultimate corporation private security force. Oh yes they are. Unlike the policeman or policewoman that is bound to the common law by swearing an oath of allegiance to the queen and the law of the land, the PCSO'S do nothing of the same. They are employed by UK PLC to uphold their rules and regulation, the statues. A policeman or policewoman can act upon you the human if you are committing a crime, that is causing harm or loss, a PCSO can not, they have to refer any crime to a lawfully deputised constable. PCSO's can only enforce the rules of UK PLC on your legal fiction, as the legal fiction is ALWAYS guilty!! A PCSO only has authority over you if you agree to represent your legal fiction and accept all rights and responsibility of said legal fiction. Itis easy to spot a rule or regulation of UK PLC as they ALL have monetary penalties if your legal fiction contravenes them. Simply put neve admit to be your legal fiction, when they ask for your name,don't be belligerent and ignore them, they are people and as such must be treat with respect. Remember that underneath the uniform is a real human being,they may be misguided and have been lied to by their employers and that it is not their fault. Be polite, give your name, the name you use in everyday life, if they ask for a surname tell them you don't have one but you do have a family name. This will confuse them but persist to tell them it is a family name and that they should record it as such. If the then refer to you as Mr. Mrs or Miss (depending on too many variables!!!) politely inform the that you are not that person and you want to be referred to as the name you gave them earlier. If possible record the interaction for posterity and training purposes. Now to be honest most of them will look at you as if you are mental and they may be right but a few are clued in. Reguardless of how they speak to you YOU MUST ALWAYS be polite to them. Keep calm and have some fun. You may need to repeat that you are not the person MR. MRS. MISS. several times but persist, one more soul will be freed when you are finished. If you have done your lawful and legal research you can try to educate the PCSO, direct them to all the sources you have researched or if like some you have copies on you give them some, all in the spirit of educating one more man soul and freeing them from slavery. NEVER tell them you UNDERSTAND, remember this is legally synonymous with stand under and gives them authority, although the PCSO won't know this, the court does!!!!! If you have done your research you will be aware that you are not required to take any paperwork given to you the PCSO and you are also entitled to read it and reject it by giving it back to them after consideration. (a contractual term, research the legal world of contact, there are many good books in the market place) If they have made the paperwork out to your legal fiction you can return it, the PCSO has not followed your request, the paperwork can only be accepted by your legal fiction, so you the human can take it read it and reject it on the grounds it is not addressed to, nor does it person to YOU. If actual fact if you do accept it you could be committing fraud!!!! Oh yes, you are taking the paperwork of another entity, by deceit, by claiming to be what you are not!!!!! So do your homework, research is your key to freedom. In short PCSO's are a private security force for UK PLC and only have jurisdiction over UK PLC employees, ie your legal fiction. They are the ultimate Polic E officer, all they can do is enforce policy. You arre not a legal fiction, remember the legal fiction is always guilty, in matters of policy. You are a human being and subject to the laws of harm or loss. Your legal fiction is subject to all acts of parliament and the statutory instruments that are created by them. Remember who YOU are and behave accordingly. Do not commit fraud, it is a crime and the police can get involved.

What are words worth?

This may seem pretty irrelevant as words have meanings and we use them everyday. I use a word and you know the meaning of it and when you reply you use words and i know the intended meaning. The meaning of words is a cultural issue. We all grow up with friends and family and learn certain meanings and definitions to the words we use in everyday language. Then we learn the meanings of new words and we have a universal reference to these meanings, we call them dictionaries. Most references to words in modern usage are taken from the Oxford english dictionary, chambers English dictionary and alike. Every language has its own dictionary to define and reference it's words in general usage. Even in English and other languages there a words that have multiple meanings, for example spelt, a method of arranging letters to make a word, or a variety of the grass family whose seeds are ground to make flour. Now then here is a question, what if a language existed that sounded like English, was using words that sound like English, are even spelt the same as English but this language is not English, how would you know the diffence? This can not be, can it? How can this be? If it sounds, is spelt like, it must be, right? Wrong!! At this point I refer you to some great English writing produced by a visionary and enlightened author, Lewis Carroll. In his epic work Alice through the looking glass, Alice has an encounter with humpty dumpty, alice questions humpty's use of the word glory, as he uses it in an unfamiliar way. Humpty then defines glory with a meaning contrary to Alice's comprehension of the word and makes the retort that humpty's definition is wrong, to which he replies that a word has the meaning that I give it, nothing more and nothing less. So if Lewis Carroll was aware of this subdue fugue then why are we not, easy they don't tell you............ (I do recommend the reading of Alice through the looking glass) OK where is this going, simple there are two languages in operation in most countries. The vernacular language and the legal language. Both sound and look the same but have different meanings ascribed to the words that are in use. We can all agreed that our language is defined by its dictionaries and that English has many to choose from, however these dictionaries do agree on the meanings of the words they contain, allowing for changes in usage as language evolves. So ask yourself this, why does the legal world have its own dictionary? Blacks Law Dictionary. Simple it defines the words in use in the legal world. In places where English jurisdiction is used the legal words look and a spelt like English, only they have different meanings....... Oh the sheer cheek. In fact there is a good reason for this and it this, they are spelt and sound the same to trick you. You believe the words being used in legal land are English and respond to their English meaning, when in fact in legal land they are speaking legalese, as defined by Blacks Law Dictionary. Some examples...... The word understand, in English it is taken to mean that you comprehend BUT in legalese it means to stand under, to give away your rights, to surrender your authority to another. So when the policeman, or any other legal official ask you if you understand,they are not asking if you comprehend they are asking you to surrender your authority to them. Another good example is person,in English we take this to mean another human being but in legalese it refers to your legal fiction, the dead entity that is always guilty and answerable to all statutes (more on this is given at length in other posts, for more details refer to them) To be sure you comprehend all legal documents why not ask them to define the words that are used, you could ask them to define ALL the words as even is, as and am, has different meanings in legalese. Don't forget to check this for yourself and don't take my word for it. After all all words contained herein are as defined by the author, failure to ask for clarification is dereliction by the reader, the meanings of any or all words used can be alterd by the author at anytime and without notice. No warranty is implied or offered. video, audire, abscondere.

Policeman and police officers

Now the first thing you will say they are both the same.... And you would be wrong! Got your attention? Keep reading and follow my reasoning and cogitate for yourself. A policeman or policewoman is a sworn upholder of the peace. They swear an oath to uphold the laws of the land and keep the peace. You can search for their oath wording and check this for yourself. So if they can only uphold the law of the land,which is common law, as enshrined in thousands of years of judicial practice, all based upon the notion of harm to another human being or their property, any breach being a crime, why are they trying to enforce statutes on us, which are NOT the LAW of The LAND??? A police officer can enforce statutes, as mentioned before statutes are contracts, so if you agree to be bound by them and default on your obligations you must be brought to account. This is where a policE officer comes into play. The general police constable is duped into believing that they are a policE officer ,when they are obviusly not as they swear their oath to uphold the LAW of The LAND and keep the peace. A police man or police woman can and must exercise their powers of discretion, when dealing with a human being, HOWEVER a policE officer has no discretion, they are only there to serve penalty notices on those PERSONS who are breaking their contracts. Just as a side note the ultimate policE officers are the PCSO's,they have sworn no oath, they are purely government employees with the explicit task of punishing those who PERSONS who break their contracts. My thoughts, a PolicE officer has NO jurisdiction over ME the HUMAN,unless I agree to be the PERSON, remembers person is an artificial entity,a LEGAL FICTION. Only if I allow them to call me Mr ............ and I answer I the affirmative do I agree to be the PERSON with my name, then I become liable for all statutory offences by default as the PERSON is always guilty. However if I refuse to be addressed as Mr.......... and insist on them calling me by my common name, the one you use in everyday life (NO SURNAME only companies have an OVER NAME) if they insist you can say you have no surname but you have a family name, if they are making notes make sure they write it down as you have said it. Remember we are all HUMAN beings, all equal under the LAW,titles are irrelevant and unnecessary to the LAW. If I live my life without causing harm or loss to another human being, the police have no jurisdiction,as I have not committed any crime. If they want to enforce statutes on me,they have to prove I, the human, consented. I am never the LEGAL FICTION, except when it suits me!!!!!! Ok this sound a bit weird but as a human I can contract with whom I like when I like.icanchoose to accept contracts that are in my favour and decline those which are not. Robert-Arthur: Menard explains this better,I suggest you check out some of his videos on YouTube. Policemen and policewomen do a fantastic job of keeping the peace for all those who reside in this country and for that they should be applauded and thanked. They just need to be gently reminded of their sworn duty and politely educated to help them educate others as to the difference between them and policE officers, the job of which they can do without.

The colour of money

What is the colour of your money? Do you really care? Well I suppose not. Money was created to make trade easier and it worked. Each coin had a value, backed by the precious metals it was made from. Then paper money was introduced to avoid carrying vast quantities of metal around with you. In actual fat paper money is an IOU. If you read the wording on band of England notes they say I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of............. So it is a promise to pay, an IOU. The paper money has no intrinsic value. Infact monopoly money and the plastic money in a childs shop have the same value as bank of England money, or any paper money where ever it is issued. We a led to believe it has value when it is just a piece of paper. It is possible to trade without it only it becomes a little difficult. Modern money is not what it once was, I looses perceived value every year, the bank call it inflation. When in reality it is not that something is going up it is the value of the money going down. £1 in your pocket at inflation of 2% means that after 1 year it is only worth 98p. So every year it buys less and less. So as a result we all want more..... The producer, the retailer and the customer all want more money each to pay for goods and services that have not actually changed. The exapmple I often cite is this....... A pair of twins mow my lawns, one to the front and one to the rear. Both lawns are the same size and require the same effort to complete the work. I pay one who mows the front with a dozen eggs and the other who mows the back,in cash. After 5 years do I still pay them the same? Let's look at the situation. Are they doing any more work, No, so should the value of the labour be the same as it was five years ago, YES. Therefore I should pay them the same, a box of 12 eggs to the twin who mows the front but if I offer the same cash to the twin who mows the back he will not be happy. Why? Well the cash I give him will not buy the same as it did five years ago. In reality the value of his labour has not changed, he still mows the same area of land it is just that the commodity I pay him with has reduced in value,in his case the Cash, money. The bank ofenglaand actually boast that the currency is what they say it is...... Just visit the BOE museum and find out for your self. They even explain what inflation is...... Why is no one listening??????? What is the colour of your money? Well it's any colour they want it to be, it's a worthless piece of paper, what gives it value is us and what we value it as. There is a way out, we could issue our own currency. Check out the lawful bank and find out how.

I work for UK plc!!!!!!

When all this sinks in it is easy to think that someone or some thing is trying to make life more difficult than it needs to be. Whether I wanted it ir not, actually no one asked, I am an employee of UK plc. I have a works number (it's your NI number), they provide benefits of employment, health care, pension. An employee I am bound by the company rules and regulations, statutes. Only thing is I never signed a contract with them!!!! It is just assumed that I, the human, will agree to represent the entity who does have the contract with them, the legal fiction that has a name similar to me. They don't care if you are "the person" or not they just want to exercise the company rules. Ever had a demand for money for someone with a similar name? Ever rang the department responsible for sending the demand? I received a demand for council tax addressed to someone with same initials and family name as mine, once opened I realised that it was intended for someone else. I rang the council concerned and explained the situation and they said it must be me they sent it to and that I must pay. In laity I nhad never lived in this councils area, ever!!!!! I was made to feel as I was in the wrong and I was asked to prove that the demand was not for a debt I owed!! I would of thought that the onus of proof was theirs. After two half hour phone calls, which I paid for and three letters more from them I got sick and just said to the minion on the receiving end of the third call, that I was not going to pay this demand that it was not my responsibility and anymore correspondence from them would be deemed harassment. No more letters and no more demands. Who do they think they are????? Do I want to live by their rules? NO Cn I terminate my employment with the UK plc? YES. The UK being a company Is subject to company law as set out in their rules and regulations. They must abide by their own rules, so they are bound by statutes. I am currently studying employment law and contract law and statutes concerned with both. I want out. I want to live by my rules and regulations and to live my life by the LAW of GOD not by the rules of men. The truth shall set you free, Lawful rebellion

What does this all mean?

In Essennce we are all being duped into believing we are a person, when infact we are nothing of the sort. Everyone is born a free. The system then fools us into thinking they have all the power and they have been doing it for hundreds of years and we just accept it!! More the fools us. The real power lies with the people and it always has. Long before the establishment of parliament we in this country had LAWS. Those same LAWS are in operation today and cover every CRIME that is every committed and set out the rules for recompense. These have been called Alfred's LAWS, after Alfred king of Wessex in the 10th century. The main thrust of these LAWS have become the central tenets of whAt is known as Common Law, which is steadily being errroded by the parliament of today, it's predecessors and most likely intensified by it's antecedents. The essence of COMMON LAW is simple, human beings are committing a crime if they cause harm or loss to another human being. These ideas were the central premis of John Stuart Mill's "Harm Principle" a simple idea that the governament seem to want to ignore. They have created many statutes that deal with assault, burglary etc.. When the LAW is already in place to cover these and most other crimes against another human being. In contrast statutes are in place to protect the person (see other posts for description of person, legally speaking) suffice to say the person is not real, it is often called the legal fiction. It is this that ALL statutes apply to, a fictitious entity. It is a fact that all of us are kept in the dark regarding the person, we are often asked to identify ourselves with this entity,for legal purposes. The truth is simple we are not persons, we are human beings, subject to the laws of GOD, not the laws of man. What this means when simply put is human beings can do anything they want, as long as no other human is caused harm or loss! The statutes do NOT apply to a human being,only to a person. So if you are asked for your name, give it burin this manner I am, XXXXXXXXX: of the family XXXXXXXXX, as commonly called Human beings have NO title,do not respond to Mr. Mrs Miss etc...... Neither do we have surnames, we have family names. Above all research this yourself, remember you are human and not a fictitious person. Live free Lawfull rebellion